CURRENT MOON

The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

The Best Beginners Telescopes

Telescope choices 600x400 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

Choose wisely when buying a Telescope Credit: meteorwatch

When people first get interested or even talk about looking at the night sky and astronomy, the first thing that jumps to mind is stargazing using a telescope. It’s like a fisherman has a rod or a boat and a painter has a brush, to many it’s a rite of passage and something they must have to feel like a proper astronomer.

There is so much a beginner can see without a Telescope and even more to see with binoculars (a pair should be owned by every beginner and budding astronomer), but there comes a time when a beginner feels they must have a telescope. This is when you can venture into a very technical and confusing world for the first time.

Just a few things to consider then we will jump into the Telescope review:

Glossy magazine adverts, hyped up marketing and the need for the most up to date gadgetry will lure the beginner toward the world of the GoTo or computerised telescope. In all honesty, DON’T GO THERE!

Computerised Telescopes are expensive and optical performance is reduced to cover the cost of the mount and computer. They are also in many cases and contrary to what the adverts tell you, very difficult to set up and use. I have heard more beginners moan about not being able to use their computerised telescope than I thought was possible – They are technical and complicated.

GoTo telescopes are really only suitable for those wanting to do a lot of astro imaging The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review or can afford many hundreds or thousands of pounds for a good telescope; this is not the realm of the beginner.

Another reason beginners are drawn to computerised Telescopes is they can press a button and the telescope will slew to your chosen object, or is supposed to if you can get it to work properly. This really is a waste of time and money because you can do that using the internet. A major part of being a Beginner or even an advanced astronomer is exploring and finding objects by star hopping and learning the night sky. This is fun and very rewarding and computerised telescopes don’t help you learn and can actually hinder and take the fun out of stargazing.

The next thing we need to consider is the type of telescope and mount (the tripod bit).

There are two main kinds of beginners telescope:  Reflector The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and Refractor The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review telescopes. There are also other more advanced types of telescope such as Schmidt Cassegrains The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review , but we won’t cover these here as they are more the domain of the advanced astronomer.

As a Beginner you really need a telescope that can do as much as possible without specializing too much in a certain area.

Newtonian/ Dobsonian reflector telescopes are used for general observing and very popular as they are better at gathering light due to larger mirror sizes than the smaller refractor telescope lenses. They have more light gathering ability and are cheaper to make. Reflectors are good all rounder’s and refractors are good on brighter objects or imaging, but there are some good beginners telescopes.

Next is the mount, the support of the telescope and this is usually an equatorial The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review or Alt Az mount The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review . Most telescopes today are sold with mounts which are equatorial (align with the celestial pole) and have knobs and adjusters for manually tracking objects, but these can be confusing for beginners and tricky to set up properly. Alt Az mounts are simple up/down and side to side manual telescope mounts and beginners find them very simple to use.

So, based on the above we need to choose the best type of telescope for a beginner, a telescope that is a general all-rounder with good optics and simple operation – a Dobsonian reflector telescope. The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

  • Relatively cheap compared to other types of telescope
  • Totally manual and incredibly easy to use
  • No setting up apart from moving it to your observing area
  • Big light gathering ability, so you can view many different objects
  • Fun and perfect for the beginner and advanced astronomer alike

There are excellent equatorial mounted reflector telescopes, but in my own experience the Dobsonian telescope wins every time for general astronomy and are perfect for beginners – EQ mounts are just a bit too fidley.

On with the review:

The Best Telescope for Beginners

The first telescope I am going to review is the Skywatcher heritage 130p flextube The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review costing roughly £140 and is available here.

heritage130p 199x300 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

Skywatcher Heritage 130p Credit: Skywatcher Telescopes

I have used this telescope and in my opinion it is probably one of the best, if not the best Beginners or even advanced astronomers telescopes available.

This amazing little telescope has a good quality 130mm mirror housed in an incredibly easy to store and use Dobsonian package. The telescope has a collapsible front section that basically makes the scope half the size (roughly 18 inches long) for storage and it takes seconds to extend for use.

SkyWatcher Heritage 130P FlexTube Dobsonian02 199x300 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

The Skywatcher Heritage 130p Flextube collapsed for easy portability and storage

The massive benefit is; this telescope is has basically no setup time apart from needing to cool down for several minutes when outside and it’s very small and portable. A beginner can place it on a garden table, a chair, a wall or any surface you choose and start using it straight away with no messing around aligning or setting up.

Once setup and in use it is apparent that the optical quality is superb and the views are excellent even with the included eyepieces. The Moon, Jupiter, Saturn, Andromeda Galaxy, Orion Nebula and a host of other objects are easily visible to beginners with this telescope.

There is a standard red dot finder The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and this was incredibly easy for a beginner to setup install and use to find objects for viewing through the scope. All you do is manually move the telescope up and down and side to side with your hands on its Alt Az mount – It’s that simple!

I have used this little telescope on a number of occasions when I would not have normally gone out observing due to setting up my more advanced and complicated telescopes, for that reason this is better than my other telescopes and one of the best telescopes available for beginners to buy. It was originally bought for a 5-year-old and she could use it straight away, it’s no toy, just simple and easy to use.

The second telescope reviewed is one of the Heritage 130’s big brothers – The Skywatcher Skyliner Telescope

 

SKYLINER 250PX 175x300 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

Skywatcher Skyliner-250PX

skywatcher flextube 250px dobsonian 203x300 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

Skywatcher Skyliner-250px Flextube


I own and use the Skywatcher Skyliner 250PX The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and it is my best telescope, just like the heritage 130 telescope The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review it ticks all the same boxes, but is a lot bigger at 250mm (10 inches) in mirror diameter (aperture). It’s basically the same telescope scaled up in a solid tube (flextube versions are available) and the only benefit over the Heritage 130 is it can see a lot more fainter objects due to the massive light gathering ability. You may occasionally hear the term light bucket to describe these types of scope.

NOTE! Bigger apertures/ mirror size usually increase brightness and contrast but does not increase magnification; that is done with eyepieces.

The Skywatcher  Skyliner and Heritage range of telescopes are perfect for the beginner and advanced astronomer, built to last and simple to use. These are windows to the Universe and sizes range from 130mm up to 300mm (12 inches). The range is priced at roughly:

  • £220 for a 150mm                                            (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £310 for a 200mm                                            (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £500 for a 250mm                                            (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £600 for a 250mm   flextube                          (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £900 for a 300mm                                           (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £1000 for a 250mm flextube Synscan          (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review (A GoTo Version if you must have it)
  • £1500 for a 300mm flextube Synscan          (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review (A GoTo Version if you must have it)

Skywatcher The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review are probably one of the best makes for the beginner as the telescopes are very good value. Dobsonian telescopes are also manufactured by Meade The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and Celestron The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and a few other telescope manufacturers and are all similar.

The third and final telescope to be reviewed is the Meade Lightbridge The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

13033 300x300 The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

Meade Lightbridge


The Meade Lightbridge telescope range is one of the best available and is placed at the upper end of the market. Sizes start at 10 inches The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and go up to a massive 16 inches The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and I have been lucky enough to use the 16 inch version with top of the range Meade eyepieces The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review .

The Lightbridge telescope oozes quality as soon as you get near it, these telescopes are built by one of the leading manufacturers in the world; Meade and are the cream of the crop of this review, but are still able to be used by a beginner, albeit a rather well off one.

Extremely smooth focuser controls and movement with the mount coupled with incredibly high quality optics – I actually saw colour in the Orion nebula using the 16 inch version once – An amazing telescope of very high quality.

The Lightbridge uses a traditional truss setup to support the upper portion of the telescope and a fabric shroud can be wrapped around to do away with stray light or damp conditions.

The Lightbridge telescope is just a larger higher quality Dobsonian telescope and I have included it for those beginners who may be interested in something at this level of quality – It’s still a Dobsonian.

The range is priced at roughly:

  • £600 for a 10 inch             (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £850 for a 12 inch             (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review
  • £1900 for a 16 inch           (Details) The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review

All of the telescopes in this review are great for the beginner; it all just depends on the size of your wallet. You can get a great starter/ beginners telescope for under £150 and go up to nearly £2000, but in my own opinion the three reviewed are the best, especially the Skywatcher Heritage 130p flextube The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review which is the most portable cost-effective choice for a beginner buying their first telescope – it ticks all the boxes!

NOTE! With all of the telescopes mentioned and all other amateur telescopes, there is a limit to what the human eye can see. The bigger the telescope is, the brighter the image will be in most cases. Visually observing through a telescope will hardly ever give similar results to those seen in images, there just isn’t enough light and the human eye is not that good in the dark. Many beginners can be disappointed that all they can see is a tiny disk of Jupiter or a very faint fuzzy grey patch that is supposed to be a Galaxy or nebula. Be prepared for this and ask at a local club to look through a telescope at varying objects to avoid disappointment.

I hope this guide helps you in choosing your new telescope.

Please visit the Meteorwatch store for telescopes The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review , planispheres The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review , Star Atlas’s The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review , binoculars The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review , eyepieces The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review and much, much more. Please browse the rest of this site for more beginners guides and information about meteors, astronomy and Space.

Enjoy your new telescope.

 

26 Responses to “The Best Telescopes for Beginners, Easy Guide and Review”

  • John Collins says:

    Thanks for your advice I’ve ordered the Skywatcher 130p and looking forward to making a start.

    I suspect it’ll arrive sooner than a cloudless night sky though….

    I wonder where I order that from?

  • Craig Johnston says:

    I’m really fancying the Skyliner 150P but I’m worried about the size. Anyone have this model? Is it really as big as it appears in photographs?!

  • AndyC says:

    Hi. I am in a similar situation to Pete and I have a similar question. I do like the sound of the simplicity of the Alt az mount, but my ultimate goal would be to photograph faint objects like nebula. Is this not possible with the simple mounts? I gather from looking at the details of other people’s photos that the images are made up by stacking lots of shorter exposures anyway, but are the scopes with the simple mounts entirely unsuitable for such a thing? And even if I were to get a scope with an equatorial mount, would it need to be powered for me to take such shots?
    And forgetting deep space objects, can you attach an SLR to the Skywatchers?
    Cheers.
    Andy.

  • Bill says:

    I’ve been an astronomer since the 60s, both amateur and professional. My tuppence worth :

    I have a few telescopes – an f/7 6″ Dob, an f/5 102mm Skywatcher Startravel refractor on an altaz mount and a 90mm altaz f/10 refractor (home built). All have their place. The Startravel is a wonderful compact, portable rich field telescope for faint fuzzies, but being just f/5 it needs eyepieces that cost almost as much as the telescope itself to get the very best out of it. The f/10 refractor is much more tolerant of cheaper eyepieces and is the one I use most – It also gives crisp, high contrast views of planets and faint fuzzies that IMO make up for the lack of light-gathering power. I don’t use the Dob very often these days partly because it takes a few minutes to set up and the observing position is uncomfortably low. BTW I live in town, which makes a difference to the kinds of objects that are of interest.
    Afocal photography with a compact digital is possible for successful Moon shots with any of these telescopes, and capable of planet shots too, despite the mounts being undriven. No faint fuzzies, though . . .

    I have access to a couple of Goto telescopes a well – including a 12″ Meade LX90. I seldom bother with them – too much to remember and the batteries can give up at the wrong moment. I share Meteorwatch’s opinion of Gotos and try to persuade beginners to avoid them and go for a Dob or simple altaz refractor. Sadly, some of them don’t follow my advice and end up discouraged and selling their purchases at a considerable loss.

  • Paul Lee says:

    Hi.
    Just my luck, I have already purchased one for my son for Christmas! It is the Celestron Astromaster 130EQ and it’s his first telescope.

    Just wondering what your thoughts are on this make/model?

    Don’t disappoint me too much!

    Thanks, Paul.

  • Dave says:

    I have been looking at getting my first telescope and was thinking of bypassing the beginner scopes and going straight onto the intermediates (for longevity). I was looking at the SkyWatcher Explorer-200P/1000 EQ5. Am I mad doing this? Should I go for the Heritage instead?

    • Meteorwatch says:

      That is a great scope and the problem you may encounter are the steep learning curve with the mount, portability and time to setup if you want to stargaze on a whim. If its size of aperture you are after and not a scope for imaging (you will need a driven mount on your EQ anyway) I would go for a 10 inch dobsonian or larger as seen in the meteorwatch store.

  • Mel says:

    Can you tell me which telescope would enable me to take pictures of the object I am viewing?

  • kevbo says:

    Im new to telescopes but the review of the Skywatcher heritage 130p flextubehas got me interested! Is the mirror completely open though? Im just worried the mirror would get dirty of some grit or leaves blown down there?!
    Are they easy to clean?

    • Meteorwatch says:

      All telescope mirrors are open as well as lensed telescopes and are exposed to the elements when in use, however they seldom get dirty unless they are abused. This applies to all telescopes.
      Mirrors are by far the easiest to clean if someone spilt soup in the tube or the mirror is covered in years worth of grime. There are very good cleaning guides for dobsonians (the easiest to clean) on the internet

  • Michelle says:

    Hi, I own a Skywatcher 127 reflector and am a complete beginner. Unfortunately the eyepieces it came with seem poor. Could you suggest some alternatives – the televue range have excellent reviews but are very expensive, are they worth it?

    Thanks

  • Gillian says:

    Thanks for your comments in this review. I’ve been giving the purchase of a beginner telescope some thought for months having previously seen you recommend the Skywatcher Heritage 130P in a Tweet. It’s in the sort of price range I’m looking for, though I’m disappointed to learn that it would not really be suitable for taking photographs with.

    However, what really puts me off is the fact that it doesn’t seem to come with a mount that can be atached to a tripod or other height adjustable portable support that is light to carry and would allow me to be seated on some kind of portable chsir and be able to use the scope in the absence of any suitable wall or furniture to stand it on. I have mobility problems and am limited in what I can lift and/or carry and, as I would need to drive out of town to get away from the light pollution in this area to see much, there’s unlikely to be much in the way of natural “stands” available for me to use that I’d be able to access with my mobility issues. Have you any suggestions for something that might meet my requirements and not break the bank ?

    Thanks for your thoughts on this.

    • Tobias says:

      Hi Gillian,

      I just read this reviews on this page, and although your post is from October las year you may be following this thread, so I thought I would reply to you, seeing that no one else has, so far. I don’t know whether or not you have found another scope or bought the Heritage 130p as you were thinking about, but if you have or are still thinking about getting a scope that will fit your needs, I have one of these minidobs since the end of last year, approximately I would think at the time you wrote here.

      I also took quite some time in looking for a scope, since I decided I wanted to get one. The thing is, like you, I’m disabled, and as I’m using a wheelchair too, I wouldn’t handle a usual tripod or EQ-mount well, and also, by sitting down, I definitely wouldn’t be able to handle such a mount when it comes to getting in a good position to the eyepiece. After and reading about some scopes, I got the suggestion to go for a 150 newtonian scope, but then the eyepiece would be out of my reach at certain positions. The same with some other versions of newts. However, I got into contact with another guy who advised me to get the Heritage 130p. He’s also in a wheelchair, and therefore knew about the specific demands that puts on a scope. Now, as for questions:

      As it comes mounted on it’s on Alt/Az mount, is it possible to use another one?

      Answer: Yes, it is possible to change mounts. It comes screwed to one arm which is easily handled, but if you don’t want this mount, just take it off and switch to another. Personally, I haven’t done this, but know people who have. The way I use it, is by placing it as it is on the ground, and sitting beside it in my chair, leaning to the eyepiece I get a perfect view of the sky. I don’t know what mobility you have, so placing a chair of your choice beside the scope may not be a good solution for you, having it on the ground. Another possibility which my friend sometimes uses, is placing it on a smaller stool or something, which shouldn’t take much place in case you are travelling to some darker place.

      If this isn’t for you and you switch the mount to something else you prefer, you will probably end up with a heavier solution (the Heritage including the mount weighs about 5-6 kg I think), but with with another mount you may also transport it in pieces, so that may be helpful for you. As I said, not knowingg your limitations makes it hard to be anymore helpful with that. Unfortunately I cannot give any advice on different mounts since I have only used the one that came with the Heritage. However, if Meteorwatch or someone else at this site thinks it okay, I could point you to another forum where I have gotten a lot of help with things such as this, and other aspects of interest regarding the Heritage 130p. I’d be happy to give more details, about this scope or others. You should know that whatever your needs in regards to a scope, you should be able to find a solution to them and get a scope that fits you. Might take some time though, and it may not be as you first thought, but one way or another you will be able to stargaze on your premisses. =)

  • Hobbes says:

    It’s worth pointing out that Newtonians require collimating which can be an awful struggle.
    So much so that I’ve sworn off Newts for Refractors. While you can get more bang for buck from a Newt, refractors are easier to use, don’t usually require collimating, don’t need cooling and are often smaller and more portable.
    Unless your skies are very dark, a 3″ ‘frac will do most of what you need.

    • Meteorwatch says:

      I disagree, if you use the right equipment such as a barlow and laser collimator, they are very easy to collimate. I do them all the time and its a case of being “scared” of doing it. Usually takes me 5 minutes to collimate a scope which has been stripped down. With a lot of cases, you don’t even need the laser and barlow, just a keen eye to see if everything is aligned. Being out slightly on most scopes is OK and most are out anyway.
      Refractors in my experience (which is a lot) can be too expensive for decent optics and will never outperform a dob for sheer light gathering abillity. Refractors are good, but not a good general purpose scope albeit, they stand out well with the positives you mention.

    • Stephen says:

      I live with high light pollution. while there’s no hope for galaxies, my 254 mm scope performs much, much better than my 60 mm scope.

      My 254 mm Newtonian Dob is a tube style dob. I collimate it once or twice a year. With a truss dob, i’d have to collimate every time. As a tube style dob, i’m limited to the 254 mm (10 inch) scope. The next size up, a 350 mm (12 inch) either is a tube dob and doesn’t fit in my car, or is a truss dob that requires collimation. I’d go with an SCT, but even a 200 mm SCT is well outside of my budget.

      A finderscope has a big advantage over a red dot finder in high light pollution. I can see much fainter stars in my 9×50 finder than i can naked eye, so i can navigate easier.

  • Andrew Hill says:

    Really appreciate all the advice here. My 14-year-old was lucky enough to be selected for a small Astronomy GCSE group at school being run by an enthusiastic teacher. My preference is to get the Skywatcher Heritage you recommend as it really is so important, especially for a teenager, that I can more or less just say ‘hey let’s go look at some stars’ and do so with minimal hassle at this stage.

    The tutor has said (and I’m sure Patrick Moore did too on last week’s programme) that a decent pair of binoculars might be an alternative.

    Have you any views, suggestions regarding them? Sorry if I’m being dumb and there’s something obvious one way or the other. Just checking before I buy something.

    To be able to get some permanent images really does seem to have a big advantage (which I presume rules out binoculars anyway) as it must be so good to show friends what you’ve seen and look at later. Is that going to be really tricky, though, without some auto moving thing? Are all the auto moving varieties awkward to set up and/or significantly poorer quality at, say, sub £300 prices?

    Thanks again.
    [I'm @kirrisdad by the way.]

    • Meteorwatch says:

      Some GoTo Scopes are good and are a neccesity when imaging, but you will need one in the £500 mark or higher to be easy to set up, use and image with. Manual scopes aren’t really any good for imaging

  • pete says:

    Thanks for this review. As someone who has been looking different telescopes for a nearly a year in order to buy one, this has given me loads more to think about.

    The skywatcher Heritage looks a cracker for the price and I was wondering if these types of telescopes had an the ability for camera attachments and the like?

    Astro-photography is something my ultimate aim but just looking at what the sky has to offer is awesome as well.

    Thanks again for this review.

    • Meteorwatch says:

      You can attach webcams and cameras to the telescope for taking images, but you will not be able to take any long exposures as the mount is not driven. You may be able to image the moon and bright planets using a simple hand guided method and free program called registax

Leave a Reply

*